How To Study The Bible #4
What Does God Intend?
By Jody L. Apple
In our previous lessons in this series we have learned three valuable
principles: (1) we must read the scriptures with the goal in mind of gaining
knowledge about them; (2) we will only learn what the scriptures teach
when we have a strong desire to do so; and (3) in order to study the Bible
fairly and completely, we must study everything that it says about a subject.
We must get the whole truth.
In this, our fourth lesson, we add one more principle: In order to study
the scriptures effectively, we must search them looking for the meaning
that God intended. That principle seems so obvious, but I assure you that
it is sometimes lost in the midst of the actual search.
Far too frequently we read the Bible to find out "what it means to me."
We might be looking for a solution to some matter that we have personal
interest in and, as a result, our inquiry takes on a very personal nature.
While it is not wrong to have personal involvement in seeking scriptural
meaning, it is wrong to assume that because we come to some conclusion
personally that such a conclusion must be right.
Studying the Bible to find out "what it means to me," though probably
the most frequently used approach, is not the only perspective that we
should have when we study. Consider the following guidelines that have
been used to determine the intent of scriptures:
(1) What does the Bible mean to me?
(2) What did the Bible mean to the original hearers/readers?
(3) What did the Bible mean to the original speakers/writers?
And finally, (4) what did God mean (i.e., intend) when he wrote the
Bible?
Each of these four perspectives is important, but only the fourth viewpoint
should serve as our ultimate guideline. It is possible to answer the other
three to our satisfaction and still not have an understanding of what God
intended by some passage. Let me explain.
We have already observed that a purely personal perspective in studying
the Bible can be dangerous. Listen to what the word of God says about it:
"You shall not at all do as we are doing here today; every man doing whatever
is right in his own eyes" (Deuteronomy 12:8). The book of Judges tells
us: "everyone did what was right in his own eyes." (Judges 17:6; cf. 21:25)
Proverbs concurs with the following: "The way of a fool is right in his
own eyes, but he who heeds counsel is wise" (Proverbs 12:15; 21:2; cf.
2 Corinthians 10:12).
The second question, seeking the understanding of the original audience
(hearers or readers), sounds like a proper perspective to keep in mind.
But it overlooks the possibility that the original audience misunderstood
what they heard or read. The Ethiopian eunuch read God's word, but he didn't
understand it, at least not initially (Acts 8:26ff). Jesus often asked
"have you not read" to his hearers because the truth was in the scriptures
which the Jews had read, but for some reason some of them had not yet grasped
the intent of the scriptures (cf. Matthew 12:3; 19:4; 21:16, 42; 22:31;
Mark 2:25; 12:10, 26; Luke 6:3; 10:26).
Note, for example, Paul's message to the church at Thessalonica. In
his first epistle to the church there, Paul gave them instructions concerning
the coming of the Lord (1 Thessalonians 4:13 - 5:11). Evidently some in
the church in Thessalonica assumed that those who died in Christ prior
to His return (those who had "fallen asleep," 1 Thessalonians 4:13) would
not witness the resurrection and had "no hope." Paul's message was one
of comfort and assurance. Those who died in Christ would actually "rise
first" (1 Thessalonians 4:16), then those who are alive at His coming would
be "caught up together with them" (vs. 17).
But even after writing to the church the first time, there seemed to
be a misunderstanding concerning the Lord's return. In his second letter
to the church Paul continued to address matters relative to Christ's return
(2 Thessalonians 1:7ff; 2:1ff). Though he already instructed them in 1
Thessalonians 5:2 that "the day of the Lord so comes as a thief in the
night," he needed to remind them about the matter again in 2 Thessalonians
2:1ff. It seems that some in the church did not understand the message
the first time.
Understanding the scriptures, therefore, from the viewpoint of the original
audience is only beneficial if we can know that the original audience understood
what God wanted them to know. To know that we first would have to know
what God intended.
The third question, seeking to know what the original authors knew,
also sounds like a proper position to assume in our study. If we had their
understanding, then certainly we would know what the Bible means. A problem
arises, however, when we learn that the authors did not always have a complete
understanding of the things they were saying. That sounds ridiculous, but
it is true. Peter tells us that the Old Testament prophets did not have
an understanding of the things they were speaking about concerning salvation:
"Of this salvation the prophets have inquired and searched diligently,
who prophesied of the grace {that would come} to you, searching what, or
what manner of time, the Spirit of Christ who was in them was indicating
when He testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the glories that
would follow. To them it was revealed that, not to themselves, but to us
they were ministering the things which now have been reported to you through
those who have preached the gospel to you by the Holy Spirit sent from
heaven; things which angels desire to look into" (1 Peter 1:10-12).
Peter, though the primary spokesman on the day of Pentecost, obviously
did not fully know the intent of what he said in Acts 2:39 about the universal
nature of God's offer of salvation. In Acts 10 and 11 God had to reveal
to him that the Gentiles were included in God's plan to save man. That
salient point had to be taught over and over in the early church, yet it
was plain in the mind and plan of God.
Only the last perspective, searching for what God intends, should serve
as an absolute guideline for our efforts in studying the Bible. We have
seen that we can misunderstand the scripture if we look only for what it
means to us. We have also seen that we can misunderstand the scripture
if we look only at the understanding of the original audience, or even
if we look only at the understanding of the original authors. But we cannot
misunderstand the scriptures if we find out what God really intends.
As you study, keep in mind that though all of the other questions can
benefit us, they can also mislead us. As you study, look for what God intended.
God says that it can be done.
"And you shall know the truth, and the truth will make you free" (John
8:32).
Copyright 1999, may be
reproducted for non-commercial purposes at no cost to others.
|