ROMANS CHAPTER 7
VERSES 1-3 "Or do you not know, brethren (for
I speak to those who know the law), that the law has dominion over a man
as long as he lives? 2- For the woman who has a husband is bound by the
law to her husband as long as he lives. But if the husband dies, she is
released from the law of her husband. 3- So then if, while her husband
lives, she marries another man, she will be called an adulteress; but if
her husband dies, she is free from that law, so that she is no adulteress,
though she has married another man. 4- Therefore, my brethren, you
also have become dead to the law through the body of Christ, that you may
be married to another; to Him who was raised from the dead, that we should
bear fruit to God."
A. "Or do you not know, brethren (for
I speak to those who know the law), that the law has dominion over a man
as long as he lives?
1. Paul is concerned about those Roman
brethren who are converted Jews (and there were certainly those present
in the Roman church) and also to those Gentile converts who were no doubt
under some pressure to take up the beggarly elements of the Law.
a. Moses Lard makes the argument that
while Paul certainly includes the Law of Moses, he is also speaking of
any law in general. knowing law, "In the expression, "1 speak to men knowing
law," I can not see an exclusive reference to the law of Moses. To restrict
the expression thus, as some have done, is certainly arbitrary. The reference
is to no particular law, but to law in general, Roman as well as Jewish.
I speak to men knowing something of law generally. The point which the
Apostle is about to make is true, to the extent intended, of all law, and
of one as much as of another. It is therefore unnecessary to assume limitations."
b. While I think that Lard’s argument has some
merit, I do not believe that it is correct. I am convinced that he is referring
to the Law of Moses.
2. He states that the Law had control over a person
until that person died. It is obvious that, since we have died and reborn
"in Christ" we are no longer under the control of the Law. This is simply
a continuation what Paul had been arguing in chapter 6. We are bound by
a new law. It is the law of grace (6:14) and Paul will later call it the
"law of the Spirit of life in Christ (8:2).
B. "For the woman who has a husband is bound by
the law to her husband as long as he lives. But if the husband dies, she
is released from the law of her husband."
1. Paul uses the principle of marriage
to illustrate how the Christian is no longer joined to the Old Law (Law
of Moses). God has always recognized marriage as being for life. The Scriptures
teach that there only two grounds for remarriage: death of a spouse, or
adultery on the part of a guilty spouse.
2. It is obvious that a woman is not
free to remarry while she has a living husband. (Of course, the only exception
being fornication on the part of her spouse - Matthew 19:9)
3. The "Law of her husband" is simply God’s law
that bind a man and woman together.
C. "So then if, while her husband lives, she marries
another man, she will be called an adulteress; but if her husband dies,
she is free from that law, so that she is no adulteress, though she has
married another man."
1. This is simply drawing the obvious
conclusion. Any woman who marries another while her husband is still alive
she is an adulteress. Of course, this principle is also true of men and
their spouses. When the woman’s husband dies she is then free to marry
again, because she is no longer married.
D. "Therefore, my brethren, you also have become
dead to the law through the body of Christ,"
1. Paul changes the figure a bit, saying
that we have died to the Law through Christ. Because we are dead to the
Law, we are not committing spiritual adultery by being married to Christ.
2. The "body of Christ" here means the body of
Christ which was given to purchase redemption for mankind and which given
to purchase redemption.
a. See Ephesians 2:14-16; Colossians
2:14; Hebrews 2:14-15
3. There also seems to be an allusion to our dying
to sin in our baptism in Romans 6:1-4.
4. It is interesting to note that he changes
from the figure of the husband being dead that frees the wife to the wife
(us) being dead to the husband (the Law) and thus freeing the dead wife
(us) to be married to another.
5. One of the footnotes in Reese’s commentary
on Romans is instructive concerning why Paul emphasized the dying of the
Christian to the Law.
a. Many Jews, including the Judaizers,
whom we believe Paul is anticipating as he writes this letter to the Romans,
thought that the Law of Moses was of perpetual validity. Thus, in their
opinion, even though a man was converted to Christ, he was still obligated
to keep the Law of Moses. Paul is denying all this by arguing that death
brings a release from law, and anyone who is immersed into Christ, be he
Jew or Gentile, is free from any obligation to the demands of the Law of
Moses.
E. "that you may be married to another; to Him who
was raised from the dead, that we should bear fruit to God."
1. The Christian is spoken of as being
married to Christ by being part of the "bride of Christ", the church. See
2 Corinthians 11:2; Ephesians 5:23-32.
2. The "fruit to God" here is probably the same
as 6:22. It is likely the fruits of the Spirit described in Galatians 5:22.
Verses 5-6 "For when we were in the flesh, the
sinful passions which were aroused by the law were at work in our members
to bear fruit to death. 6- But now we have been delivered from the law,
having died to what we were held by, so that we should serve in the newness
of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the letter."
A. "For when we were in the flesh, the
sinful passions which were aroused by the law were at work in our members
to bear fruit to death."
1. Being in the flesh simply refers
to the time before they were Christians and the thrust of this verse must
refer to those Christians who had been under the domination of the Law
of Moses, the Jews.
2. It is significant to note that the word "aroused"
is not found in the original text. It should read, "the sinful passions
where were by the law." With this in mind we need only go to verse 7 to
see what Paul is trying to tell us. Without God’s law the sinful passions
that all mankind possess if misdirected would be unknown. Concerning this
point, these transgressions of God’s law were always wrong but were amplified
for every Jewish believer to see and realize how terrible they were by
the Law of Moses, complete with all its regulations.
a. This was the nature of the Law. It
provided the believer with condemnation without forgiveness and an understanding
of God’s revulsion at their sin without and enjoyment of God’s grace.
3. It was clear that, without forgiveness, all those
who lived under the law were doomed to live out their lives in condemnation
and be lost. This is why it is so important to realize that the blood of
Christ was meant to cleanse all who had been faithful to God’s law before
the cross, as well as those who lived afterward (Hebrews 9:15).
B. "But now we have been delivered from the law,
having died to what we were held by, so that we should serve in the newness
of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the letter."
1. The Law of Moses was a hard taskmaster
which condemned all those who sought to follow it. The state of mind of
the person who seeks to please God through the Law of Moses, and fights
the evil passions of the flesh, is found in verses 16-24.
2. But now we live under a different law. It
is described as the "newness of the Spirit." This is the same as the "newness
of life" in 6:4. We have forgiveness of sins, and an assurance that we
have eternal life as God’s children (1 John 5:13). Here is the difference
in our servitude. We are no long bound as a slave to sin but have chosen
to live for and serve a loving master who has freed us from the yoke of
condemnation.
3. "Newness of the Spirit" is a contrast to the
"oldness of the Law."
VERSES 7-11 "What shall we say then? Is the law
sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except
through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law
had said, "You shall not covet." 8- But sin, taking opportunity by the
commandment, produced in me all manner of evil desire. For apart from the
law sin was dead. 9- I was alive once without the law, but when the commandment
came, sin revived and I died. 10- And the commandment, which was to bring
life, I found to bring death. 11- For sin, taking occasion by the commandment,
deceived me, and by it killed me. 12- Therefore the law is holy, and the
commandment holy and just and good."
A. "What shall we say then? Is the law
sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except
through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law
had said, "You shall not covet."
1. Paul next answers what many would
now conclude to his first six verses. If they are now freed from the Old
Law because they have died to it, then why must be bad, or sinful. This
is the exact same statement that Paul makes in 6:1.
a. Reese suggests that Paul is dealing
with those who would compare the freeing of the Christian from sin and
from law and saying that the law was sinful.
2. Aside from the obvious that the Law came from
God, Paul teaches another lesson that shows conclusively that the Law was
good. He strongly declares, "Certainly not." ("God forbid" - KJV), then
makes the argument that he would not have a consciousness of sin without
the Law.
a. Paul uses the same argument concerning
the sin revealing nature of the Law. See 3:20; 4:15; and 5:13.
B. "But sin, taking opportunity by the commandment,
produced in me all manner of evil desire. For apart from the law sin was
dead."
1. The Law was not wicked but the sinful
hearts of men found the commands of God a good excuse to chafe at regulations
as seek to sin more.
2. There is a tendency on the part of men who
have fallen from God’s grace to have a tendency to desire sin even more
when it is forbidden. This is what Paul meant by the last point. Without
the commandments of the Law there is no sin. So, for example, there would
be no guilt on the part of man not to offer sacrifice (and a consequent
temptation to rebel against God’s Law) if that Law did not exist. We have
no guilt about not burning incense, because there is no law commanding
the burning of such under the new covenant..
C. "I was alive once without the law, but when the
commandment came, sin revived and I died. 10- And the commandment, which
was to bring life, I found to bring death."
1. This is likely referring to a time
when, in his early childhood, Paul had no understanding of sin and its
relationship to the Law of Moses. But when he reached an age where he began
to understand the Law he committed sin and died spiritually.
2. The faithful Jew would have thought that the
Law would bring life or freedom, but experience taught them that it only
brought spiritual death because it condemned without hope of justification.
D. "For sin, taking occasion by the commandment,
deceived me, and by it killed me."
1. Sin is personified here as a person.
One could just as easily use the name of Satan here. The commandments of
the Law of Moses gave the Devil the opportunity to deceive men into transgressing
more or God’s Law. One needs only look to what happened to Eve to see what
the Devil did. See 2 Corinthians 11:3 and Genesis 3.
E. "Therefore the law is holy, and the commandment
holy and just and good."
1. Paul is drawing a logical conclusion
to the argument that began in verse seven.
2. The Law was pure and holy. It did not cause
sin. Sin, as personified by one person, the Devil, caused people to become
exceedingly sinful.
Verse 13- "Has then what is good become death
to me? Certainly not! But sin, that it might appear sin, was producing
death in me through what is good, so that sin through the commandment might
become exceedingly sinful.
A. "Has then what is good become death
to me? Certainly not!
1. Paul again pauses to answer another
objection, or rather, a quibble. Someone would probably ask, "If the Law
is so good like you say Paul, why did it cause me to die (spiritually).
2. Again, Paul strongly objects to their objection.
"Certainly not" or as the KJV says, "God forbid."
B. "But sin, that it might appear sin, was producing
death in me through what is good"
1. The real reason for any grief in
the heart of man was sin.
C. "so that sin through the commandment might become
exceedingly sinful"
1. What the Law did was take sin and
amplify it and make it look worse to mankind.
2. It showed up as even worse to sinners because
it showed the attitude of God toward sin and sinners.
3. Also, even though the Law of God was good,
because of it’s nature, tended to make sinners feel their hopelessness.
There is some difference of opinion as to how to
interpret the remaining verse in this section. The difference is roughly
split between those who believe that Paul is talking about his condition
before he came to Christ and those who believe that Paul is talking about
a common condition of all Christians. If Paul is talking about the former
he is saying that the Law created a desire in him to do write but, because
there was no mechanism for cleansing of sins, there was a constant struggle
in him because of his sins. If Paul is talking about the latter he would
be referring to the Christian’s struggle with sin daily. In keeping with
the entire chapter context I am convinced that Paul is referring to his
condition before he became a Christian and when he was subject to the Law
of Moses.
VERSES 14-17 For we know that the law is spiritual,
but I am carnal, sold under sin. 15- For what I am doing, I do not understand.
For what I will to do, that I do not practice; but what I hate, that I
do. 16- If, then, I do what I will not to do, I agree with the law that
it is good. 17- "But now, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells
in me."
A. "For we know that the law is spiritual,
but I am carnal, sold under sin."
1. It is true that Paul uses the present
tense but it seems unlikely that he is referring to his condition while
being a Christian. If Paul was referring to the Christian life, how can
this possibly square with Paul’s statement in chapter 8:1-2?
2. The Law of Moses was a spiritual in that,
although there were fleshy rules and regulations, it came from the Lord.
3. Paul had been sold under sin. That is, when
he reached an age where he knew the law and sin, he chose to sin and became
a slave of sin. See John 8:34.
B. "For what I am doing, I do not understand. For
what I will to do, that I do not practice; but what I hate, that I do."
1. Perhaps the RSV is best here when
it translates the first part of the verse as, "I do not understand my own
actions."
2. Paul felt the helplessness of the faithful
Jew under the Law of Moses who sincerely sought to obey God but fell short.
3. Paul is saying that he had the will to obey
the Law, but did not always have the strength to always obey it. This is
the sentiment that Jesus expressed concerning the apostles in Matthew 26:41.
4. Paul is not saying, as the Calvinist contend,
that fallen man is devoid of even the desire to do good.
C. "If, then, I do what I will not to do, I agree
with the law that it is good."
1. In this passage Paul is saying that
if he admits that he falls below the standards of the Law he thus admits
to the rightness of the standard. Just because mankind does not live in
perfect harmony with God’s standard does not mean that the standard is
bad.
2. Paul nowhere said that the Law’s strict moral
codes were evil. On the contrary, coming from God, they were excellent
and, to the extent that mankind was able to live up to their percepts,
they created a better way of life for man.
D. "But now, it is no longer I who do it, but sin
that dwells in me."
1. Paul is saying that sin so dominated
him that it became "responsible" for his not being able to conduct his
life in perfect with the Law of Moses.
2. Paul is not suggesting that he bore no personal
responsibility toward God for his action. He was merely illustrating the
enslaving nature of sin. This is what Jesus suggests (John 8:34).
3. The phrase, "sin that dwells in me" suggests
the controlling nature of sin outside of Christ.
VERSES 18-24 "For I know that in me (that is,
in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will is present with me, but how
to perform what is good I do not find. 19- For the good that I will to
do, I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice. 20- Now
if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that
dwells in me. 21- I find then a law, that evil is present with me, the
one who wills to do good. 22- For I delight in the law of God according
to the inward man. 23- But I see another law in my members, warring against
the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which
is in my members. 24- O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from
this body of death?"
A. "For I know that in me (that is,
in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will is present with me, but how
to perform what is good I do not find. For the good that I will to do,
I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice."
1. Paul admits what most men have come
to understand throughout history. They want to do what is right and good
but the weakness of the flesh to temptation often causes them to give in
to sin.
2. Paul wants to explain why "the spirit is willing
but the flesh is weak," thus he uses "for."
3. It is true that the practice of sin can make
us reprobate and unable to adequately follow the Law of God. This is the
true significance of the phrase, "and were by nature children of wrath"
in Ephesians 2:3. "By nature" in the Greek literally means "something learned
because of a long practice of sin."
4. Paul reiterates that, even though he wants
to do what is right, he often does not.
B. "Now if I do what I will not to do, it is no
longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me."
1. This is the same conclusion that
Paul made in verse 17. Once again, Paul is NOT saying that men outside
of Christ are not responsible to God. What he is saying is that because
men choose to rebel against the Law of God they become enslaved to sin.
C. "I find then a law, that evil is present with
me, the one who wills to do good. 22- For I delight in the law of God according
to the inward man."
1. Did Paul hate and despise the Law
of Moses? Certainly not! His intellect understood that the Law came from
God, it had precepts which were for the general benefit and happiness of
mankind, and were morally and spiritually superior to any law of man.
2. Most men possess what we might call their
"better nature." It is that part of them which understands and sympathizes
with right and good and understands that, even though they might not always
do it, God’s way is best for their lives.
D. "But I see another law in my members, warring
against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of
sin which is in my members."
1. Paul saw a part of him which was
tempted by sin and enjoyed the practice of sin. There is that part of man,
which because of continued practice, delights in sinful conduct.
2. Even though that, "better nature" desires
to do right, because we have become the slaves of sin, we tend to be enslaved
by the nature and consequences of sin.
E. "O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me
from this body of death?"
1. Without a true means of forgiveness
there can be not deliverance from the enslavement of sin.
2. This comes back to one of the real purposes
of the Law of Moses. It was to show the awfulness of sin. Without a mechanism
of forgiveness and deliverance, it showed the awfulness of sin without
the possibility of freedom from its consequences. This led Paul to declare
that he was in a hopeless situation.
Verse 25- "I thank God; through Jesus Christ
our Lord! So then, with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with
the flesh the law of sin."
A. "I thank God; through Jesus Christ
our Lord!"
1. This is really the conclusion to
the whole matter. Jesus Christ delivered him from this hopeless situation!
He now has forgiveness, through the blood of Jesus (Ephesians 1:7) and
true freedom (John 8:36).
2. Paul cannot be referring to his present state.
If he were he would be saying that it is possible for men to truly accept
the pardon found in Christ and still be enslaved. While it does seem to
be the case that men can still struggle with sin, even as Christian, it
is not the case that we must remain the slaves of sin.
B. "So then, with the mind I myself serve the law
of God, but with the flesh the law of sin."
1. After briefly digressing to expression
the joy that Paul has in Christ, he goes back to the condition of men who
have been enslaved by sin. It is entirely proper to say that this is a
continuing link from chapter 7 with chapter 8.
2. There is that "war of the minds"
which causes man to want to do what is right, but because of the enslavement
of sin, cannot keep the Law perfectly.
Copyright 1999 by Grady
Scott may be reproducted for non-commercial purposes at no cost to others.
|