ACTS CHAPTER 23
Acts 23:1-5- "Then Paul, looking earnestly at the council, said,
"Men and brethren, I have lived in all good conscience before God until
this day." {2} And the high priest Ananias commanded those who stood by
him to strike him on the mouth. {3} Then Paul said to him, "God will strike
you, you whitewashed wall! For you sit to judge me according to the law,
and do you command me to be struck contrary to the law?" {4} And those
who stood by said, "Do you revile God's high priest?" {5} Then Paul said,
"I did not know, brethren, that he was the high priest; for it is written,
'You shall not speak evil of a ruler of your people.'""
A. A few comments about the Sanhedrin.
1. The highest Jewish council in the first century. The council
had 71 members and was presided over by the high priest. The Sanhedrin
included both of the main Jewish parties among its membership. Since the
high priest presided, the Sadducean priestly party seems to have predominated;
but some leading Pharisees also were members (Acts 5:34; 23:1-9).
2. According to Jewish tradition, the Sanhedrin began with
the 70 elders appointed by Moses in Numbers 11:16 and was reorganized by
Ezra after the Exile. However, the Old Testament provides no evidence of
a council that functioned like the Sanhedrin of later times. Thus, the
Sanhedrin had its origin sometime during the centuries between the Testaments.
B. Paul would have to use his wits to escape the same fate
as Jesus, Stephen, and James.
1. He clearly declared his innocence- "I have lived in good
conscience before God until this day."
2. His conscience was clear before God concerning his actions
as a Christian.
C. The High Priest's rash action and Paul's reaction.
1. It is very clear that the High Priest, who served as president
of the Sanhedrin, would not be impartial in Paul's case. He became so angry
that he commanded that one of the persons standing next to Paul strike
him on the mouth for having the "insolence" to declare himself innocent.
2. Paul's reacted with expected anger. "Whitewashed wall" hearkens
back to Jesus statement that the leaders were hypocrite who pretended to
be righteous on the outside but were really rotten inside. See Matthew
23:27-28. He also said that God would strike him down for his violation
of the Law concerning his trial.
3. It is likely that Paul had reference to Leviticus 19:35,
"'You shall do no injustice in judgment, in measurement of length, weight,
or volume." This emphasized that those who passed judgement should be fair
and honest in their dealings. It is clear that intimidation of those being
judged would violate the spirit, if not the exact letter, of this passage.
D. Some speculate as to why Paul did not recognize the High
Priest.
1. The High Priesthood was being passed around every year or
two (This was a tactic of the Romans to reward loyalty and to keep any
one man from being too strong). It is possible that Paul did not know exactly
who the High Priest was.
2. Perhaps he was so shocked by what he said that he assumed
that this could not be the High Priest.
3. At least one commentator speculates that Paul's eyesight
was bad, thus under certain circumstances Paul would not immediately recognize
the High Priests. We are sure that Paul had some problems in this area.
See also Galatians 6:11.
4. In any event Paul was not apologetic, not wanting to violate
God's law in any way. See Deuteronomy 17:8ff. Paul always showed a general
respect for legal authority. See Romans 13:1ff.
Acts 23:6-10- "But when Paul perceived that one part were Sadducees
and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, "Men and brethren,
I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee; concerning the hope and resurrection
of the dead I am being judged!" {7} And when he had said this, a dissension
arose between the Pharisees and the Sadducees; and the assembly was divided.
{8} For Sadducees say that there is no resurrection; and no angel or spirit;
but the Pharisees confess both. {9} Then there arose a loud outcry. And
the scribes of the Pharisees' party arose and protested, saying, "We find
no evil in this man; but if a spirit or an angel has spoken to him, let
us not fight against God." {10} Now when there arose a great dissension,
the commander, fearing lest Paul might be pulled to pieces by them, commanded
the soldiers to go down and take him by force from among them, and bring
him into the barracks."
A. "But when Paul perceived that one part were Sadducees and
the other Pharisees..."
1. Paul decided he would need to use his wits. He decided to
divide his enemies against each other.
2. There was several distinctive difference between the groups.
a. The Pharisees believed in life after death, while the Sadducees
did not.
b. The Pharisees believed in angels and demons while the Sadducees
denied their existence.
c. Most important of all, the Pharisees believed in the principle
of the resurrection of the dead, while the Sadducees denied it.
B. "Concerning the hope and resurrection of the dead I am being
judged!"
1. Paul knew that this would have the desired effect.
2. It would split the Sanhedrin and cause dissension. As long
as Paul was being judged as being a rebel or general troublemaker the Sanhedrin
would be united. But he claimed it was because he was persecuted for his
believe in good Pharisee doctrine, it would stir the Pharisees to come
to his aid.
C. "And when he had said this, a dissension arose between the
Pharisees and the Sadducees; and the assembly was divided."
1. No doubt many of the Sadducees cried out that Paul was guilty,
while the Pharisees were quick to come to his aid.
2. Luke explains for his readers what we have already stated,
that there was a division of belief between the Pharisee and Sadducees
on supernatural things.
3. The word "protested" in verse nine carries with it the idea
of, "to fight fiercely, as in an altercation." It would not be the first
time a legal proceeding degenerated into a fistfight.
D. "Now when there arose a great dissension, the commander,
fearing lest Paul might be pulled to pieces by them..."
1. Paul had perhaps hoped that this ploy might gain his freedom.
But at the very least it had the effect of a reprieved from such a group
of biased judges.
2. Paul was a Roman citizen. The commander had personal responsibility
over Paul safety. If Paul had been injured or killed it would have been
his responsibility.
3. The Roman commanded decided to act quickly. He ordered his
troops to personally intervene to extract Paul from this dangerous situation
and bring him to safety.
Acts 23:11- "But the following night the Lord stood by him and said,
"Be of good cheer, Paul; for as you have testified for Me in Jerusalem,
so you must also bear witness at Rome."
A. "But the following night the Lord stood by him and said"
1. It seems that Paul received special comfort and strength
from the Lord himself on occasion, due to the great relative importance,
danger, and stress of his mission.
2. Paul has already described how the Lord appeared to him
earlier. We have no reason to not believe that the Lord appeared to him
on occasions that Paul did not mention. We know that Paul was taken up
into the "third heaven" (2 Corinthians 12:2f).
B. "Be of good cheer, Paul; for as you have testified for Me
in Jerusalem, so you must also bear witness at Rome."
1. We can infer that Paul was quite understandably troubled
by the events of that past few hours. He was possibly worried for his own
safety, or perhaps worried that he would not be able to go to Rome like
he so earnestly desired. It is also possible that he might have questioned
himself again concerning his wisdom in going to Jerusalem.
2. The Lord assured Paul that nothing was going to stand in
his way of going to Rome to be a witness for him. Notice that the Lord
did not promise to save Paul's life, or even give him more comfortable
surroundings, but to make sure that Paul had the opportunity to be a witness
for him in Rome.
The Plot To Kill Paul
Verses 12-15 And when it was day, some of the Jews banded together
and bound themselves under an oath, saying that they would neither eat
nor drink till they had killed Paul. {13} Now there were more than forty
who had formed this conspiracy. {14} They came to the chief priests and
elders, and said, "We have bound ourselves under a great oath that we will
eat nothing until we have killed Paul. {15} "Now you, therefore, together
with the council, suggest to the commander that he be brought down to you
tomorrow, as though you were going to make further inquiries concerning
him; but we are ready to kill him before he comes near.""
A. "And when it was day, some of the Jews banded together and
bound themselves under an oath..."
1. Such was the hatred on the part of some of the Jews toward
Paul and the cause of Christ that they banded together to murder Paul.
2. Assassins were active in Paul's day in Judea. They would
continue to stir up trouble by their terrorist tactics. They would assassinate
Ananias, the corrupt and wicked high priest in Jerusalem who heard Paul's
case.
3. This was more than just a couple of disgruntled men. There
were forty involved in this plot.
B. "They came to the chief priests and elders, and said..."
1. This shows how wicked the leadership of the Jews was. These
great defenders of the Law were quite willing to hear about and give encouragement
for a wicked plot to commit murder.
2. They had taken an oath to not eat anything until they had
killed Paul. The KJV seems to better catch the spirit of this passage when
it translates here, "great curse." They likely called down Heaven to do
the same thing to them that they were planning for Paul, if they failed.
3. The plot was simple and well conceived. They wanted the
leaders to ask the Romans to bring Paul to meet with the full counsel,
away from the relative safety of the Roman headquarters in the Tower of
Antonia. Somewhere along the way they would ambush Paul and his escort
and kill him.
Verses 16-22 "So when Paul's sister's son heard of their ambush, he
went and entered the barracks and told Paul. {17} Then Paul called one
of the centurions to him and said, "Take this young man to the commander,
for he has something to tell him." {18} So he took him and brought him
to the commander and said, "Paul the prisoner called me to him and asked
me to bring this young man to you. He has something to say to you." {19}
Then the commander took him by the hand, went aside and asked privately,
"What is it that you have to tell me?" {20} And he said, "The Jews have
agreed to ask that you bring Paul down to the council tomorrow, as though
they were going to inquire more fully about him. {21} "But do not yield
to them, for more than forty of them lie in wait for him, men who have
bound themselves by an oath that they will neither eat nor drink till they
have killed him; and now they are ready, waiting for the promise from you."
{22} So the commander let the young man depart, and commanded him, "Tell
no one that you have revealed these things to me.""
A. "So when Paul's sister's son heard of their ambush..."
1. It's very difficult to keep such a thing a secret, seeing
that it was told to the forty and repeated before the leadership of the
Sanhedrin. It only takes one person to bring it to light.
2. We're not told how Paul's nephew heard of the plot, just
that he did.
3. We are told precious little concerning Paul's family. Were
they Christians? Was he estranged from them because of his faith in Christ?
No one knows for sure. In any event, this young man felt the need to warn
Paul concerning the impending attempt on his life.
B. "Then Paul called one of the centurions to him and said..."
1. Paul immediately grasped the importance of the information
that the young man brought. He knew that it would be much more convincing
if the young man spoke personally to the commander, so he called for a
centurion and requested that he be taken to him.
2. We can tell that the Romans had a great deal of respect
for Paul, for they immediately did as he requested, taking the young man
to Lysias, the Roman commander.
C. "Then the commander took him by the hand, went aside and
asked privately..."
1. The taking by the hand is suggestive that the young man
was a young child, although the text does not say for sure.
2. Lysias was taking no chances. Spies were everywhere. He
took the young man off aside where no one by he and the young man could
hear the conversation.
3. The plot was serious enough. Over 40 men had sworn to not
eat anything until they had killed Paul. They Sanhedrin was part of the
plot too, planning to ask for Paul to be taken to them for further questioning.
Paul would have only a light guard for transport. It would be easy for
such a large group of men to overpower the three or four Roman guards around
Paul.
4. Lysias wanted no one to know that he was privy to the plot.
He urged the young man to tell no one of their conversation.
Acts 23:23-35- "And he called for two centurions, saying, "Prepare two
hundred soldiers, seventy horsemen, and two hundred spearmen to go to Caesarea
at the third hour of the night; {24} "and provide mounts to set Paul on,
and bring him safely to Felix the governor." {25} He wrote a letter in
the following manner: {26} Claudius Lysias, to the most excellent governor
Felix: Greetings. {27} This man was seized by the Jews and was about to
be killed by them. Coming with the troops I rescued him, having learned
that he was a Roman. {28} And when I wanted to know the reason they accused
him, I brought him before their council. {29} I found out that he was accused
concerning questions of their law, but had nothing charged against him
deserving of death or chains. {30} And when it was told me that the Jews
lay in wait for the man, I sent him immediately to you, and also commanded
his accusers to state before you the charges against him. Farewell.
A. "And he called for two centurions, saying..."
1. Lysias decided to acts quickly and decisively. He would
send Paul away, transferring him to Caesarea.
2. The escort would be large enough to discourage any attempt
at assassination, even by 40 men. It would consist of 470 troops, among
them 200 legionaries.
3. They would also leave in the middle of the evening, at 9:00
p.m.
B. Paul would be sent to Felix, the procurator of Judea.
1. The procurator of Judea at the time Paul the apostle visited
Jerusalem for the last time and was arrested there (Acts 23:24). Antonius
Felix became procurator of Judea in A.D. 52, succeeding Cumanus. He remained
in office until A.D. 60, when the emperor Nero recalled him. He is depicted
in Acts as a man who listened with interest to Paul's defense but failed
to make any decision with regard to the case or with regard to the personal
implications of Paul's message. Rather he hoped Paul would pay him a bribe
(Acts 24:26). Contemporary historians Tacitus and Josephus paint Felix
as a brutal, incompetent politician who was finally replaced. One writer
said of him, "With savagery and lust, he exercised the powers of a king
with the disposition of a slave."
2. Lysias briefly stated the facts. Paul was not under arrest,
but under protective custody. The Jews had brought certain charges against
them, concerning the Law of Moses. He had transferred Paul from Jerusalem
to Caesarea for his safety, and had instructed Paul's accusers to appear
before Felix.
Verses 31-35 "Then the soldiers, as they were commanded, took Paul and
brought him by night to Antipatris. {32} The next day they left the horsemen
to go on with him, and returned to the barracks. {33} When they came to
Caesarea and had delivered the letter to the governor, they also presented
Paul to him. {34} And when the governor had read it, he asked what province
he was from. And when he understood that he was from Cilicia, {35} he said,
"I will hear you when your accusers also have come." And he commanded him
to be kept in Herod's Praetorium."
A. "Then the soldiers, as they were commanded, took Paul and
brought him by night to Antipatris"
1. Paul and the soldiers arrived the next evening at Antipas.
Antipas was a town a little over half way between Jerusalem and Caesarea.
It was about 40 miles from Jerusalem and 26 miles south of Caesarea.
2. The 200 legionaries went back to their barracks in Jerusalem,
satisfied that there would be no one following them capable to successfully
attacking the remaining troops.
3. H. Leo Boles makes the observation that the arrival of Paul
under such a guard must have impressed the Caesarian Christians as to the
fulfillment of the prophecies concerning Paul's arrest and imprisonment.
God's word will always come true.
B. Felix's actions.
1. He first inquired to make sure that Paul was not in his
jurisdiction. Having done that he could confidently devise some way to
turn the situation to his advantage.
2. We can tell the Roman's attitude toward Paul. He was housed
in Herod's old palace, not a dungeon or jail. Here he would remain for
about 2 years.
Copyright 1999 by Grady Scott
may be reproducted for non-commercial purposes at no cost to others.
|